您的位置: 首页 > 经典案例> 医学学术文献案例
西安利君制药有限责任公司(中译英)

范本片段

《世界针灸杂志》有限公司
摘要  目的:观察刺络拔罐结合穴位贴敷对神经根型颈椎病青年患者的疗效。方法:61例神经根型颈椎病患者按随机数字表法分为穴贴组与电针组,穴贴组在项背、肩胛骨脊柱旁两侧采用刺络拔罐结合阿是穴穴位贴敷治疗,电针组在夹脊、风池、肩井、肩髃、外关、后溪,大椎采用电针治疗,观察两组患者在总体症状体征积分与总体疗效方面的优劣。结果:穴贴组总体症状体征积分改善较电针组更为明显(9.96±2.02 vs 15.87±1.84,P <0.05;10.02±1.76 vs 13.59±1.52,P <0.05),穴贴组总有效率(93.55%)也优于电针组(83.33%),差异有统计学意义( P <0.05)。结论:刺络拔罐结合穴位敷贴对神经根型颈椎病青年患者有良好治疗效果。
Abstract: Objective: To observe the efficacy of treating young patients with cervical spondylosis radiculopathy (CRS) with bleeding collaterals  and cupping combined with herbal patches on acupuncture pointsherbal patches on acupuncture points. Methods: 61 CRS patients were randomly divided into the herbal patches on acupuncture points group or the electro-acupuncture group. Both sides of the spine and scapula were treated with bleeding collaterals and cupping combined with herbal patches on acupuncture points over ashi points in the herbal patches on acupuncture points group. The following points received electro-acupuncture in the electro-acupuncture group:  Jiā jĭ (夹脊 EX-B2), Fēng chí (风池 GB 20), Jiān jĭng (肩井 GB 21), Jiān yú (肩髃 LI 15), Wài guān (外关 TE 5), Hòu xī (后溪 SI 3) and Dà zhuī (大椎 CV 14). Patients in the two groups were compared in terms of scores for total symptoms and signs, and the pros and cons of each method were analyzed.  Results: Total symptoms and signs forthe herbal patches on acupuncture points group were more significantly improved compared to the electro-acupoint group (9.96 ± 2.02 vs 15.87 ± 1.84, P <0.05; 10.02 ± 1.76 vs 13.59 ± 1.52, P <0.05). The total effective rate of the herbal patches on acupuncture points group (93.55%) was better than that of the electro-acupuncture group (83.33%), and the differences were statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: Good therapeutic effects can be achieved in treating young CRS patients with bleeding collaterals and cupping combined with herbal patches on acupuncture points.

范本片段

400-668-5181版权所有 爱译互联(北京)信息技术有限公司 京ICP备17006203号